arrow
返回

Representing and reducing error in natural-resource classification using model combination

delete2005-05-01
delete20
PRE
AI
Z
Zhi Huang
B
Brian G. Lees
DOI:10.1080/13658810500032446delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Artificial Intelligence ( AI) models such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Decision Trees and Dempster-Shafer's Theory of Evidence have long claimed to be more error-tolerant than conventional statistical models, but the way error is propagated through these models is unclear. Two sources of error have been identified in this study: sampling error and attribute error. The results show that these errors propagate differently through the three AI models. The Decision Tree was the most affected by error, the Artificial Neural Network was less affected by error, and the Theory of Evidence model was not affected by the errors at all. The study indicates that AI models have very different modes of handling errors. In this case, the machine-learning models, including ANNs and Decision Trees, are more sensitive to input errors. Dempster-Shafer's Theory of Evidence has demonstrated better potential in dealing with input errors when multisource data sets are involved. The study suggests a strategy of combining AI models to improve classification accuracy. Several combination approaches have been applied, based on a 'majority voting system', a simple average, Dempster Shafer's Theory of Evidence, and fuzzy-set theory. These approaches all increased classification accuracy to some extent. Two of them also demonstrated good performance in handling input errors. Second-stage combination approaches which use statistical evaluation of the initial combinations are able to further improve classification results. One of these second-stage combination approaches increased the overall classification accuracy on forest types to 54% from the original 46.5% of the Decision Tree model, and its visual appearance is also much closer to the ground data. By combining models, it becomes possible to calculate quantitative confidence measurements for the classification results, which can then serve as a better error representation. Final classification products include not only the predicted hard classes for individual cells, but also estimates of the probability and the confidence measurements of the prediction.
Keyword:
representing error
reducing error
natural-resource classification
model combination
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

International Journal of Geographical Information Science 封面图
International Journal of Geographical Information Science
IF:
5.1
论文数:
2.7K
被引数:
9.3K

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

Iridium 192 implantation of T1 and T2 carcinomas of the mobile tongue
err1990-12-01
err0
PREAI
errJ.J. Mazeron; J.M. Crook; V. Benck; G. Marinello; M. Martin; M. Raynal; E. Haddad; R. Peynègre; J.P. Le Bourgeois; W. Walop; B. Pierquin
err分享
err收藏
Fuzzy sets模糊集
err1965-06-01
err0
errOAAI
errL.A. Zadeh
err分享
err收藏
Survey on paediatric tumour boards in Europe: current situation and results from the ExPo-r-Net project
err2018-01-08
err0
PREAI
errA. Juan Ribelles; P. Berlanga; G. Schreier; M. Nitzlnader; B. Brunmair; V. Castel; S. Essiaf; A. Cañete; R. Ladenstein
err分享
err收藏
Prenatal allergen and diesel exhaust exposure and their effects on allergy in adult offspring mice
err2010-05-11
err0
errOAAI
errLin Corson; Huaijie Zhu; Chunli Quan; Gabriele Grunig; Manisha Ballaney; Ximei Jin; Frederica P Perera; Phillip H Factor; Lung-Chi Chen; Rachel L Miller
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容