.png){kind=icon}
返回
Research Exceptionalism
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1080/15265161.2010.482630.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Research involving human subjects is much more stringently regulated than many other nonresearch activities that appear to be at least as risky. A number of prominent figures now argue that research is overregulated. We argue that the reasons typically offered to justify the present system of research regulation fail to show that research should be subject to more stringent regulation than other equally risky activities. However, there are three often overlooked reasons for thinking that research should be treated as a special case. First, research typically involves the imposition of risk on people who do not benefit from this risk imposition. Second, research depends on public trust. Third, the complexity of the moral decision making required favors ethics committees as a regulative solution for research.
Keyword:
ethics committees
human subjects research
professional ethics
regulatory issues
research ethics
risk
benefit analysis
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
20.8
论文数:
6.7K
被引数:
4.0K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容