返回
Response competition better explains Stroop interference than does response exclusion
DOI:10.3758/s13423-020-01846-0.png)
摘要
En 中文
Researchers debate whether Stroop interference from an incongruent word in color-naming response time is caused by response competition or by response exclusion. According to the former account, the interference reflects competition in lexical response selection during color name planning, whereas according to the latter, the interference reflects the removal of a motor program for the incongruent word from an articulatory buffer after planning. Here, numerical predictions about the magnitude of Stroop interference as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony were derived from these accounts. These predictions were then tested on representative data in the literature. Measures of goodness-of-fit showed that the numerical predictions of a response competition account are closer to the empirical data than those of the response exclusion account. These results indicate that response competition provides a better explanation of interference in naming than does response exclusion.
Keyword:
Articulatory buffer
Competition
Response exclusion
Stroop interference
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
P
IF:
3
论文数:
4.5K
被引数:
1.5W
机构
引用论文
Fungal Colonization of Peanut Fruit as Related to Southern Corn Rootworm Injury花生果实中真菌的定殖与南方玉米根萤叶甲伤害的关系
Color naming of colored non-color words and the response-exclusion hypothesis: A comment on Mahon et al. and on Roelofs and Piai
CORTEX
IF3.3
Introduction: Genomic organization, diversity and evolution of plant reoviruses引言:植物呼肠孤病毒的基因组结构、多样性与进化
Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modelling attentional control in the Stroop task
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
IF5.8

