arrow
Return

Robust 3D Bloch-Siegert based B1+mapping using multi-echo general linear modeling

delete2019-07-18
delete10
delete
OA
AI
N
Nadège Corbin *
J
Julio Acosta‐Cabronero
S
Shaihan Malik
M
Martina F. Callaghan
DOI:10.1002/mrm.27851delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Purpose Quantitative MRI applications, such as mapping the T-1 time of tissue, puts high demands on the accuracy and precision of transmit field (B1+) estimation. A candidate approach to satisfy these requirements exploits the difference in phase induced by the Bloch-Siegert frequency shift (BSS) of 2 acquisitions with opposite off-resonance frequency radiofrequency pulses. Interleaving these radiofrequency pulses ensures robustness to motion and scanner drifts; however, here we demonstrate that doing so also introduces a bias in the B1+ estimates. Theory and Methods It is shown here by means of simulation and experiments that the amplitude of the error depends on MR pulse sequence parameters, such as repetition time and radiofrequency spoiling increment, but more problematically, on the intrinsic properties, T-1 and T-2, of the investigated tissue. To solve these problems, a new approach to BSS-based B1+ estimation that uses a multi-echo acquisition and a general linear model to estimate the correct BSS-induced phase is presented. Results In line with simulations, phantom and in vivo experiments confirmed that the general linear model-based method removed the dependency on tissue properties and pulse sequence settings. Conclusion The general linear model-based method is recommended as a more accurate approach to BSS-based B1+ mapping.
Keywords:
B-1(+) mapping
Bloch-Siegert shift
GLM
interleaved acquisition
multi-echo readout
RF spoiling
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine cover
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
IF:
3
Papers:
1.2W
Citations:
3.1W

Organization

U
University College London
Scholars:
7.9W
Papers: 6.2W
Citations: 15.7W
U
university of london
Scholars:
21.5W
Papers: 19.7W
Citations: 305