返回
Robust and sparse banking network estimation
DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.03.041.png)
摘要
En 中文
Network analysis is becoming a fundamental tool in the study of systemic risk and financial contagion in the banking sector. Still, the network structure must typically be estimated from noisy and aggregated data, as micro data on the status quo banking network structure are often unavailable, or the true network is unobservable. Graphical models can help researchers to infer network structures, but they are often criticized for relying too heavily on unrealistic assumptions. They also tend to yield dense structures that are difficult to interpret. Here, we propose the tlasso model for estimating sparse banking networks. The tlasso captures the conditional dependence structure between banks through partial correlations, and estimates sparse networks in which only the relevant links are identified. The model also accounts for the non-Gaussianity of financial data and it is robust to outliers and model misspecification. Our empirical analysis focuses on estimating the dependence structure of a sample of European banks from credit default swap data. We observe that the presence of communities in the banking network plays an important role in terms of systemic risk and contagion dynamics. We also introduce a decomposition of strength centrality that allows us to better characterize the role of each bank in the network and to identify the most relevant channels for the transmission of financial distress. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Finance
Financial networks
Tlasso
Graphical models
CDS spreads
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6
论文数:
2.2W
被引数:
6.4W
机构
引用论文
THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE受试者工作特征 (ROC) 曲线下面积的含义和用途
RADIOLOGY
IF15.2
Compression and Air Storage Systems for Small Size CAES Plants: Design and Off-design Analysis小型CAES工厂的压缩和空气存储系统: 设计和非设计分析
Capital Shortfall: A New Approach to Ranking and Regulating Systemic Risks
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW
IF11.6

