arrow
返回

Robust radiotherapy planning

delete2018-11-12
delete213
delete
OA
AI
J
Jan Unkelbach *
M
Mark Bangert
R
Rasmus Bokrantz
T
Timothy C. Y. Chan
J
Joseph O. Deasy
A
Albin Fredriksson
B
Bram L. Gorissen
M
Marcel van Herk
W
Wei Liu
H
Houra Mahmoudzadeh
O
Omid Nohadani
J
Jeffrey V. Siebers
M
Marnix G. Witte
H
Huijun Xu
DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/aae659delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Motion and uncertainty in radiotherapy is traditionally handled via margins. The clinical target volume (CTV) is expanded to a larger planning target volume (PTV), which is irradiated to the prescribed dose. However, the PTV concept has several limitations, especially in proton therapy. Therefore, robust and probabilistic optimization methods have been developed that directly incorporate motion and uncertainty into treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Thereby, the explicit definition of a PTV becomes obsolete and treatment plan optimization is directly based on the CTV. Initial work focused on random and systematic setup errors in IMRT. Later, inter-fraction prostate motion and intra-fraction lung motion became a research focus. Over the past ten years, IMPT has emerged as a new application for robust planning methods. In proton therapy, range or setup errors may lead to dose degradation and misalignment of dose contributions from different beams - a problem that cannot generally be addressed by margins. Therefore, IMPT has led to the first implementations of robust planning methods in commercial planning systems, making these methods available for clinical use. This paper first summarizes the limitations of the PTV concept. Subsequently, robust optimization methods are introduced and their applications in IMRT and IMPT planning are reviewed.
Keyword:
radiotherapy planning
organ motion
uncertainty
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Physics in Medicine and Biology 封面图
Physics in Medicine and Biology
IF:
3.4
论文数:
1.4W
被引数:
3.1W

机构

M
Massachusetts General Hospital
学者数:
3.4W
论文数: 2.6W
被引数: 8.6W
H
Harvard University
学者数:
26.5W
论文数: 22.0W
被引数: 28.7W
R
Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg
学者数:
5.6W
论文数: 4.3W
被引数: 66
U
university zurich hospital
学者数:
1.2W
论文数: 9.5K
被引数: 7
U
university of zurich
学者数:
5.1W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 65
G
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
学者数:
1.5W
论文数: 1.1W
被引数: 17
M
mayo clinic phoenix
学者数:
7.1K
论文数: 5.6K
被引数: 4
M
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
学者数:
3.4W
论文数: 2.4W
被引数: 4.6W
U
University of Waterloo
学者数:
2.2W
论文数: 2.3W
被引数: 3.3W
H
Harvard Medical School
学者数:
6.5W
论文数: 4.8W
被引数: 91
N
Northwestern University
学者数:
6.2W
论文数: 5.3W
被引数: 3.9K
U
University of Manchester
学者数:
5.7W
论文数: 5.3W
被引数: 7.4W
U
university of toronto
学者数:
14.8W
论文数: 12.0W
被引数: 165
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

Impact of Initiating Screening Programs on Referral and Management of Cervical Cancer in Tanzania
err2019-12-01
err0
errOAAI
errAmi Sedani; Amr S. Soliman; Khadija Msami; Diwani Msemo; Julius Mwaiselage; Kendra Schmid; Crispin Kahesa
err分享
err收藏
Robust optimization methods for cardiac sparing in tangential breast IMRT
err2016-11-30
err23
PREAI
errMahmoudzadeh, Houra; Lee, Jenny; Chan, Timothy C. Y.; Purdie, Thomas G.
err分享
err收藏
XFeasibility of online IMPT adaptation using fast, automatic and robust dose restoration
err2018-04-20
err59
PREAI
errBernatowicz, Kinga; Geets, Xavier; Barragan, Ana; Janssens, Guillaume; Souris, Kevin; Sterpin, Edmond
err分享
err收藏
Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach
err2009-08-11
err23
errOAAI
errMoore, Joseph A.; Gordon, John J.; Anscher, Mitchell S.; Siebers, Jeffrey V.
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Beam configuration selection for robust intensity-modulated proton therapy in cervical cancer using Pareto front comparison
err2016-02-08
err15
PREAI
errvan de Schoot, A. J. A. J.; Visser, J.; van Kesteren, Z.; Janssen, T. M.; Rasch, C. R. N.; Bel, A.
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容