.png){kind=icon}
返回
Running vacuum model versus ?CDM - a Bayesian analysis
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1093/mnras/stab3773.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
We study the significance of the running vacuum model in which the vacuum energy density depends on the square of Hubble parameter, in comparison with the ?CDM model. The Bayesian inference method is employed to appraise the relative significance of the running vacuum model, using the combined data sets, SN1a+CMB+BAO and SN1a+CMB+BAO+OHD. The model parameters and the corresponding errors are estimated from the marginal probability density function of the model parameters. The parameter that distinguish the running vacuum model from the ?CDM model is nu. With the SN1a+CMB+BAO data set, we have found that the parameter nu is different from zero at similar to 2.7 sigma. With the second data set, SN1a+CMB+BAO+OHD, the significance improved considerably to 3.4 sigma. Marginalizing over all model parameters with suitable prior, we have obtained the Bayes factor as the ratio of Bayesian evidence of our model and the ?CDM model. The analysis based on Jeffrey's scale of bayesian inference shows that the evidence of our model against the ?CDM model is weak for the data set SN1a+CMB+BAO. We have obtained a definite evidence of running vacuum model for SN1a+CMB+BAO + OHD data set. This indicates that the dark energy could be dynamical.
Keyword:
methods: data analysis
methods: statistical
cosmology: observations
cosmology: dark energy
期刊
IF:
4.8
论文数:
7.1W
被引数:
25.0W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏Selecting informative subsets of sparse supermatrices increases the chance to find correct treesOAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容