Scatterometer data interpretation: Estimation and validation of the transfer function CMOD4

doi:10.1029/96JC02860

Scatterometer data interpretation: Estimation and validation of the transfer function CMOD4

1997-03-15

494

OA

AI

DOI：10.1029/96JC02860

原文链接

原文求助

摘要

En 中文

In this paper we estimate the 18 coefficients of the CMOD4 sigma(0)-to-wind transfer function using a maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method in order to improve the-prelaunch function. We show that a MLE method has to be used with caution when dealing with a nonlinear relationship or with measurement errors that depend on the measured values. In the transfer function estimation it is crucial to use the components of the wind, rather than wind speed and direction, to use sigma(0) in logarithmic units rather than physical ones, and to use well-sampled input data. In Stoffelen and Anderson [1997a] we showed that the triplets of measured backscatter are very coherent and, when plotted in a three-dimensional measurement space, they lie on a well-defined conical surface. Here we propose a strategy for validation of a transfer function, the first step of which is to test the ability of a transfer function to fit this conical surface. We derive an objective measure to compute the average fit of the transfer function surface to the distribution of measured sigma(0) triplets. The transfer function CMOD4, derived in the first part of this paper, is shown to fit the cone surface to within the observed scatter normal to the cone, i.e., within roughly 0.2 dB, equivalent to a root-mean-square wind vector error of similar to 0.5 m s(-1). The second step in the validation strategy is the verification of retrieved scatterometer winds at each position on the cone surface. Scatterometer winds computed from CMOD4 compare better to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts model winds than real-time conventional surface wind data (ship, buoy, or island reports) with the root-mean-square wind vector difference typically 3.0 m s(-1). This surprising result can be explained by the so-called representativeness error. We further s show that no Significant spatial wind error correlation is present in scatterometer data and therefore conclude that the ERS1 scatterometer provides winds useful for weather forecasting and climate studies.

Scatterometer data interpretation: Estimation and validation of the transfer function CMOD4

摘要

期刊

机构

引用论文