arrow
返回

Science, Worldviews, and Education

delete2006-11-16
delete30
delete
OA
AI
H
Hugh G. Gauch *
DOI:10.1007/s11191-006-9059-1delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Whether science can reach conclusions with substantial worldview import, such as whether supernatural beings exist or the universe is purposeful, is a significant but unsettled aspect of science. For instance, various scientists, philosophers, and educators have explored the implications of science for a theistic worldview, with opinions spanning the spectrum from positive to neutral to negative. To delineate a mainstream perspective on science, seven key characterizations or pillars of science are adopted from position papers from the world's largest scientific organization, the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Based on those pillars and an examination of scientific method, I argue that the presuppositions and reasoning of science can and should be worldview independent, but empirical and public evidence from the sciences and humanities can support conclusions that are worldview distinctive. I also critique several problematic perspectives: asserting that science can say nothing about worldviews and the opposite extreme of insisting that science decisively supports one particular worldview; weakening science so severely that it lacks truth claims; and burdening science with unnecessary presuppositions. Worldview-distinctive conclusions based on empirical evidence are suitable for individual convictions and public discussions, but not for institutional endorsements and scientific literacy requirements.
Keyword:
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
atheism
empirical evidence
humanities
human nature
miracles
natural theology
powers and limits of science
presuppositions
public evidence
realism
religion
scientific literacy
scientific method
scientism
skepticism
standard logic
testability
theism
worldview

期刊

S
Science & Education
IF:
2.5
论文数:
0
被引数:
0

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

HPV L1 and P16 Expression in CIN1 to Predict Future CIN2+HPV L1和P16在CIN1中的表达以预测未来CIN2+
err2017-05-01
err0
PREAI
errChong Liu; Hui Du; Chun Wang; Jerome L. Belinson; Bin Yang; Wei Zhang; Jinlong Tang; Ruifang Wu
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Scientists and religion in America
err1999-09-01
err22
PREAI
errLarson, EJ; Witham, L
err分享
err收藏
p16INK4aexpression as a potential marker of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia progressionp16INK4a 表达作为低级别宫颈上皮内瘤变进展的潜在标志物
err2014-12-04
err0
PREAI
errLarissa Bastos Eloy da Costa; Renata De Marchi Triglia; Marcondes Cavalcante França Junior; Liliana A. Lucci De Angelo Andrade
err分享
err收藏
Perception of Threat and Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Expatriates in Makkah Region, Saudi Arabia
err2021-06-21
err0
errOAAI
errMajed A. Algarni; Mohammad S. Alzahrani; Yasser Alatawi; Raghad A. Alasmari; Hashem O. Alsaab; Atiah H. Almalki; Abdullah A. Alhifany; Yusuf S. Althobaiti
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容