返回
摘要
En 中文
Whether science can reach conclusions with substantial worldview import, such as whether supernatural beings exist or the universe is purposeful, is a significant but unsettled aspect of science. For instance, various scientists, philosophers, and educators have explored the implications of science for a theistic worldview, with opinions spanning the spectrum from positive to neutral to negative. To delineate a mainstream perspective on science, seven key characterizations or pillars of science are adopted from position papers from the world's largest scientific organization, the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Based on those pillars and an examination of scientific method, I argue that the presuppositions and reasoning of science can and should be worldview independent, but empirical and public evidence from the sciences and humanities can support conclusions that are worldview distinctive. I also critique several problematic perspectives: asserting that science can say nothing about worldviews and the opposite extreme of insisting that science decisively supports one particular worldview; weakening science so severely that it lacks truth claims; and burdening science with unnecessary presuppositions. Worldview-distinctive conclusions based on empirical evidence are suitable for individual convictions and public discussions, but not for institutional endorsements and scientific literacy requirements.
Keyword:
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
atheism
empirical evidence
humanities
human nature
miracles
natural theology
powers and limits of science
presuppositions
public evidence
realism
religion
scientific literacy
scientific method
scientism
skepticism
standard logic
testability
theism
worldview
期刊
S
IF:
2.5
论文数:
0
被引数:
0
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection in end stage renal disease patients: A prospective observational study来迪帕韦和索磷布韦用于终末期肾病患者未经治疗的HCV基因1型感染:一项前瞻性观察研究
p16INK4aexpression as a potential marker of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia progressionp16INK4a 表达作为低级别宫颈上皮内瘤变进展的潜在标志物
APMIS
IF0

