arrow
返回

Scientific computer simulation review

delete2015-06-01
delete29
delete
OA
AI
K
Kaizer, Joshua S. *
H
Heller, A. Kevin
O
Oberkampf, William L.
DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.020delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Before the results of a scientific computer simulation are used for any purpose, it should be determined if those results can be trusted. Answering that question of trust is the domain of scientific computer simulation review. There is limited literature that focuses on simulation review, and most is specific to the review of a particular type of simulation. This work is intended to provide a foundation for a common understanding of simulation review. This is accomplished through three contributions. First, scientific computer simulation review is formally defined. This definition identifies the scope of simulation review and provides the boundaries of the review process. Second, maturity assessment theory is developed. This development clarifies the concepts of maturity criteria, maturity assessment sets, and maturity assessment frameworks, which are essential for performing simulation review. Finally, simulation review is described as the application of a maturity assessment framework. This is illustrated through evaluating a simulation review performed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In making these contributions, this work provides a means for a more objective assessment of a simulation's trustworthiness and takes the next step in establishing scientific computer simulation review as its own field. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keyword:
Scientific computer simulation review
Maturity assessment
Measurement of simulation trustworthiness
Requirements for simulation trustworthiness
Code review
Maturity framework
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

R
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
IF:
11
论文数:
9.0K
被引数:
4.2W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

Role of native nephrectomy in renal transplant recipients
err2002-03-01
err0
PREAI
errW.C Nahas; E Mazzucchi; M.S Pinheiro; I Antonopoulos; E David-Neto; L.E Ianhez; S Arap
err分享
err收藏