arrow
返回

Sedation-free colonoscopy

delete2005-04-01
delete57
PRE
AI
Y
Yuuichi Takahashi *
H
Hideaki Tanaka
M
Mitsuyo Kinjo
K
Ken Sakumoto
DOI:10.1007/s10350-004-0860-0delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
PURPOSE: The administration of sedative drugs at colonoscopy has its drawbacks, such as increasing the rate of complications and the cost. There are a number of potential advantages to performing colonoscopy without sedation. The aim of this study is to evaluate patient tolerance and acceptance during sedation-free colonoscopy. METHODS: Pain during sedation-free colonoscopy was evaluated in consecutive series of 675 patients in a prospective manner from January 1, 2003, to February 18, 2004. We recorded the degree of patient pain during colonoscopy, willingness to undergo sedation-free colonoscopy in the future, the complication rate, and the intubation time. The assisting endoscopy nurses and patients independently assessed the pain level immediately after the procedure using a four-point pain scale (nil, mild, moderate, severe). RESULTS: Almost all colonoscopies (99.6 percent: 672/675) were successful. There were four complications related to colonoscopy (bleeding after polypectomy). Patients and nurses rated pain by a four-point pain scale as follows. For the patients: nil, 69.6 percent (470/675); mild, 28.0 percent (189/675); moderate, 2.2 percent (15/675); severe, 0.1 percent (1/675). For the nurses: nil, 76.1 percent (514/675); mild, 22.7 percent (153/675); moderate, 0.9 percent (6/675); severe, 0.3 percent (2/675). Patients rarely suffered from severe pain during carefully performed colonoscopies. The pain level of almost all colonoscopies was acceptable by patients, with only six patients (1.0 percent) stating that they would never undergo a colonoscopy without sedation in the future because of unbearable pain. CONCLUSIONS: This study, Suggests that carefully performed sedation-free colonoscopy rarely causes complications and is well accepted by most patients. Sedation-free colonoscopy is more cost-effective, may be safer, and should be offered as an alternative to colonoscopy with sedation.
Keyword:
UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
PATIENT TOLERANCE
CONTROLLED-TRIAL
PREMEDICATION
AUDIT
PAIN

期刊

D
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
IF:
3.7
论文数:
8.2K
被引数:
1.3W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
DETERMINANTS OF PAIN ASSESSMENT BY NURSES
err1990-01-01
err32
PREAI
errHALFENS, R; EVERS, G; ABUSAAD, H
err分享
err收藏
Imaging Marine Life with a Thin Light‐Sheet
err2013-12-06
err0
PREAI
errJérémie Capoulade; Emmanuel G. Reynaud; Malte Wachsmuth
err分享
err收藏
Colonoscopy without premedication versus barium enema: A comparison of patient discomfort
err1996-08-01
err32
PREAI
errEckardt, VF; Kanzler, G; Willems, D; Eckardt, AK; Bernhard, G
err分享
err收藏
Adhesiolysis
err1991-06-01
err0
PREAI
errAVNER HERSHLAG; MICHAEL P. DIAMOND; ALAN H. DeCHERNEY
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: Patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters
err1997-01-01
err122
PREAI
errFroehlich, F; Thorens, J; Schwizer, W; Preisig, M; Kohler, M; Hays, RD; Fried, M; Gonvers, JJ
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容