.png){kind=icon}
返回
Sizing user stories using paired comparisons
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.infsof.2009.04.003.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Agile estimation approaches usually start by sizing the user stories to be developed by comparing them to one another. Various techniques, with varying degrees of formality, are used to perform the comparisons - plain contrasts, triangulation, planning poker, and voting. This article proposes the use of a modified paired comparison method in which a reduced number of comparisons is selected according to an incomplete cyclic design. Using two sets of data, the authors show that the proposed method produces good estimates, even when the number of comparisons is reduced by half those required by the original formulation of the method. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Agile estimation
Triangulation
Estimating by analogy
Paired comparisons
Software sizing
Expert estimation
Expert judgment
Project planning
Incomplete cyclic designs
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.3
论文数:
3.8K
被引数:
7.7K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
没有更多内容
没有更多内容