.png){kind=icon}
返回
Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.ijar.2009.02.006.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been considered only recently in the literature. In this paper we provide a twofold contribution to this kind of analysis. First, starting from the traditional concepts of skeptical and credulous acceptance, we introduce a comprehensive set of seven skepticism relations, which provide a formal Counterpart to several alternative notions of skepticism at an intuitive level. Then we carry out a systematic comparison of a significant set of literature semantics (namely grounded, complete, preferred, stable, semi-stable, ideal. prudent and CF2 sennantics) on the basis of the proposed skepticism relations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Argumentation theory
Argumentation semantics
Skepticism relations
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3
论文数:
3.0K
被引数:
5.1K
机构
引用论文
The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea稻瘟病菌Magnaporthe grisea的基因组序列.png)
NatureOAAI
NatureIF0
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容