.png){kind=icon}
返回
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION (CONTINUED) - COMMENT
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.2307/2082436.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
In this Review in June 1993 Anne Schneider and Helen Ingram argued that the social construction of target populations is an important political and policy phenomenon. Robert Lieberman criticizes Schneider and Ingram's ''circular'' conceptualization of public policy and social construction. He proposes a ''historical-institutional'' framework for understanding the role of group identities in political change. Lieberman analyzes the dual experience of African-Americans in the American welfare state as an example of political institutions and policy changes' affecting changing group constructions. Ingram and Schneider respond that their purpose is to understand how social constructions shape policy designs, which in turn affect citizen perceptions and participation, and argue that Lieberman's ideas of institutions and history yield no analytic improvement. They provide their own analysis of the case of welfare to illustrate the advantages for future research of their conception of policy targets.
期刊
IF:
5.8
论文数:
8.7K
被引数:
2.1W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Ordered mesoporous N-doped carbon supported Ru for selective adsorption and hydrogenation of quinoline有序介孔氮掺杂碳负载Ru对喹啉的选择性吸附和加氢
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容