.png){kind=icon}
返回
Software Change Contracts
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1145/2729973.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Software errors often originate from incorrect changes, including incorrect program fixes, incorrect feature updates, and so on. Capturing the intended program behavior explicitly via contracts is thus an attractive proposition. In our recent work, we had espoused the notion of change contracts to express the intended program behavior changes across program versions. Change contracts differ from program contracts in that they do not require the programmer to describe the intended behavior of those program features which are unchanged across program versions. In this work, we present the formal semantics of our change contract language built on top of the Java modeling language (JML). Our change contract language can describe behavioral as well as structural changes. We evaluate the expressivity of the change contract language via a survey given to final-year undergraduate students. The survey results enable to understand the usability of our change contract language for purposes of writing contracts, comprehending written contracts, and modifying programs according to given change contracts. Finally, we develop both dynamic and static checkers for change contracts, and show how they can be used in maintaining software changes. We use our dynamic checker to automatically suggest tests that manifest violations of change contracts. Meanwhile, we use our static checker to verify that a program is changed as specified in its change contract. Apart from verification, our static checker also performs various other software engineering tasks, such as localizing the buggy method, detecting/debugging regression errors, and classifying the cause for a test failure as either error in production code or error in test code.
Keyword:
Languages
Reliability
Theory
Verification
Software changes
dynamic checking
static checking
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
A
IF:
6.2
论文数:
1.2K
被引数:
3.4K
机构
引用论文
Mentor alpha 1 inflatable penile prosthesis: Patient satisfaction and device reliability.png)
Urology
UrologyIF0
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容