.png){kind=icon}
返回
Software product lines and variability modeling: A tertiary study
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jss.2018.12.027.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Context: A software product line is a means to develop a set of products in which variability is a central phenomenon captured in variability models. The field of SPLs and variability have been topics of extensive research over the few past decades. Objective: This research characterizes systematic reviews (SRs) in the field, studies how SRs analyze and use evidence-based results, and identifies how variability is modeled. Method: We conducted a tertiary study as a form of systematic review. Results: 86 SRs were included. SRs have become a widely adopted methodology covering the field broadly otherwise except for variability realization. Numerous variability models exist that cover different development artifacts, but the evidence is insufficient in quantity and immature, and we argue for better evidence. SRs perform well in searching and selecting studies and presenting data. However, their analysis and use of the quality of and evidence in the primary studies often remains shallow, merely presenting of what kinds of evidence exist. Conclusions: There is a need for actionable, context-sensitive, and evaluated solutions rather than novel ones. Different kinds of SRs (SLRs and Maps) need to be better distinguished, and evidence and quality need to be better used in the resulting syntheses. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Keyword:
Software product line
Variability
Variability modeling
Systematic literature review
Mapping study
Tertiary study
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.1
论文数:
5.5K
被引数:
8.4K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations一种评估技术评估的严谨性和工业相关性的方法
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容