.png){kind=icon}
返回
Solving multi-objective structural optimization problems using GDE3 and NSGA-II with reference points
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112187.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Structural optimization problems can be described as multi-objective optimization problems (MOOPs) due to the presence of multiple conflicting objectives. Recently, procedures based on the decision-maker's preferences have attracted the interest of researchers. This type of information allows for the search technique to focus only on regions of interest instead of all possible solutions. Despite its advantage, incorporating these preferences into the search engine remains scarcely explored in multi-objective structural optimization design problems (MOSOPs). We propose here solving MOSOPs using multi-objective meta-heuristics guided by reference points. Particularly, variants where the decision-maker's preferences drive the search of the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), the third evolution step of Generalized Differential Evolution (GDE3), and GDE3 + APM, which is GDE3 equipped with a constraint handling technique called Adaptive Penalty Method (APM), are considered. These approaches are labelled respectively as R-NSGA-II, R-GDE3, and R-GDE3 + APM. It is relevant to highlight that the R-GDE3 and R-GDE3 + APM are proposed in this paper. The results indicate that all were competitive and generated good solutions when solving the MOSOPs considered here. In addition, R-NSGA-II outperformed the remaining techniques in the computational experiments.
Keyword:
Multi-objective structural optimization
Preferences information
Reference points
Differential evolution
Adaptive penalty method
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.4
论文数:
2.1W
被引数:
8.7W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the Strength Pareto approach多目标进化算法: 比较案例研究和强度帕累托方法
PREAI
分享收藏
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容