arrow
Return

Stability evaluation for text localization systems via metamorphic testing

delete2021-11-01
delete1
PRE
AI
R
Rongjie Yan *
S
Siqi Wang
Y
Yixuan Yan
H
Hongyu Gao
J
Jun Yan
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2021.111040delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The success of learning techniques in solving a variety of hard AI problems promotes the flourish of recognition-based applications. Many state-of-the-art text localization systems, which can detect and report the positions of text segments in an image, are mainly implemented with learning-based techniques. Data-driven learning raises a series of questions on how to verify, validate and evaluate such learning-based systems. In this paper, we propose a methodology to automatically evaluate the stability of text localization systems via metamorphic relations, where a stable system should output consistent results for similar inputs with the same text segments. We introduce six metamorphic relations that should be preserved in a stable text localization system and define the corresponding metrics for stability evaluation. With the defined metamorphic relations, we apply metamorphic testing techniques to compare the inputs and outputs to evaluate system stability, and further diagnose the causes of inconsistency. The extensive experimentation on both academic and commercial text localization systems demonstrates the effectiveness of our method on stability evaluation for such systems. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Learning techniques
Text localization
Stability
Metamorphic testing
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Systems and Software cover
Journal of Systems and Software
IF:
4.1
Papers:
5.4K
Citations:
8.4K

Organization

I
institute of software, cas
Scholars:
445
Papers: 387
Citations: 0
C
chinese academy of sciences
Scholars:
56.2W
Papers: 44.8W
Citations: 704