.png){kind=icon}
返回
Standardized endoscopic reporting
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/jgh.12489.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The need for standardized language is increasingly obvious, also within gastrointestinal endoscopy. A systematic approach to the description of endoscopic findings is vital for the development of a universal language, but systematic also means structured, and structure is inherently a challenge when presented as an alternative to the normal spoken word. The efforts leading to the Minimal Standard Terminology (MST) of gastrointestinal endoscopy offer a standardized model for description of endoscopic findings. With a combination of lesion descriptors and descriptor attributes, this system gives guidance to appropriate descriptions of lesions and also has a normative effect on endoscopists in training. The endoscopic report includes a number of items not related to findings per se, but to other aspects of the procedure, formal, technical, and medical. While the MST sought to formulate minimal lists for some of these aspects (e. g. indications), they are not all well suited for the inherent structure of the MST, and many are missing. Thus, the present paper offers a recommended standardization also of the administrative, technical, and other periendoscopic elements of the endoscopic report; important also are the numerous quality assurance initiatives presently emerging. Finally, the image documentation of endoscopic findings is becoming more obvious-and accessible. Thus, recommendations for normal procedures as well as for focal and diffuse pathology are presented. The recommendations are minimal, meaning that expansions and subcategories will likely be needed in most centers. Still, with a stronger common grounds, communication within endoscopy will still benefit.
Keyword:
gastrointestinal endoscopy
imaging
quality
standardization
terminology
期刊
IF:
3.4
论文数:
1.0W
被引数:
1.5W
机构
引用论文
Minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy:: Results of prospective testing and validation in the GASTER project.png)
ENDOSCOPY
ENDOSCOPYIF12.8
PREAI
分享收藏Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study
PREAI
分享收藏Clinical validation of the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) II criteria in an open-access unit: a prospective studyENDOSCOPY
OAAI
ENDOSCOPYIF12.8
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容