arrow
返回

Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement

delete2017-03-06
delete694
delete
OA
AI
H
Hilary Pinnock *
M
Melanie Barwick
C
Christopher R. Carpenter
S
Sandra Eldridge
G
Gonzalo Grandes
C
Chris Griffiths
J
Jo Rycroft‐Malone
P
Paul Meißner
E
Elizabeth Murray
A
Anita Patel
A
Aziz Sheikh
S
Stephanie Taylor
DOI:10.1136/bmj.i6795delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Implementation studies are often poorly reported and indexed, reducing their potential to inform initiatives to improve healthcare services. The Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) initiative aimed to develop guidelines for transparent and accurate reporting of implementation studies. Informed by the findings of a systematic review and a consensus-building e-Delphi exercise, an international working group of implementation science experts discussed and agreed the StaRI Checklist comprising 27 items. It prompts researchers to describe both the implementation strategy (techniques used to promote implementation of an underused evidence-based intervention) and the effectiveness of the intervention that was being implemented. An accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document (published in BMJ Open, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013318) details each of the items, explains the rationale, and provides examples of good reporting practice. Adoption of StaRI will improve the reporting of implementation studies, potentially facilitating translation of research into practice and improving the health of individuals and populations.
Keyword:
COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS
FRAMEWORK
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

B
BMJ and British Medical Journal
IF:
42.7
论文数:
4.8W
被引数:
17.4W

机构

Q
Queen Mary University London
学者数:
2.0W
论文数: 1.5W
被引数: 327
W
washington university (wustl)
学者数:
5.5W
论文数: 4.5W
被引数: 70
U
university of london
学者数:
21.5W
论文数: 19.7W
被引数: 305
S
Saint Louis University
学者数:
1.1W
论文数: 8.7K
被引数: 151
U
University of Edinburgh
学者数:
5.2W
论文数: 4.6W
被引数: 71
U
university of toronto
学者数:
14.8W
论文数: 12.0W
被引数: 165
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息