.png){kind=icon}
返回
STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1002/smj.4250130904.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This article reviews the strategic decision making literature by focusing on the dominant paradigms-i.e., rationality and bounded rationality, politics and power, and garbage can. We review the theory and key empirical support, and identify emergent debates within each paradigm. We conclude that strategic decision makers are boundedly rational, that power wins battles of choice, and that chance matters. Further, we argue that these paradigms rest on unrealistic assumptions and tired controversies which are no longer very controversial. We conclude with a research agenda that emphasizes a more realistic view of strategic decision makers and decision making, and greater attention to normative implications, especially among profit-seeking firms in global contexts.
Keyword:
STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING
BOUNDED RATIONALITY
POLITICS
POWER
GARBAGE CAN
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
7.2
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
4.6W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
查看更多内容