返回
Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: Average-based citation indicators
DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2012.02.006.png)
摘要
En 中文
This paper investigates the citation impact of three large geographical areas - the U.S., the European Union (EU), and the rest of the world (RW) - at different aggregation levels. The difficulty is that 42% of the 3.6 million articles in our Thomson Scientific dataset are assigned to several sub-fields among a set of 219 Web of Science categories. We follow a multiplicative approach in which every article is wholly counted as many times as it appears at each aggregation level. We compute the crown indicator and the Mean Normalized Citation Score (MNCS) using for the first time sub-field normalization procedures for the multiplicative case. We also compute a third indicator that does not correct for differences in citation practices across sub-fields. It is found that: (1) No geographical area is systematically favored (or penalized) by any of the two normalized indicators. (2) According to the MNCS, only in six out of 80 disciplines - but in none of 20 fields - is the EU ahead of the U.S. In contrast, the normalized U.S./EU gap is greater than 20% in 44 disciplines, 13 fields, and for all sciences as a whole. The dominance of the EU over the RW is even greater. (3) The U. S. appears to devote relatively more - and the RW less - publication effort to sub-fields with a high mean citation rate, which explains why the U.S./EU and EU/RW gaps for all sciences as a whole increase by 4.5 and 5.6 percentage points in the un-normalized case. The results with a fractional approach are very similar indeed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Citation analysis
Web of Science categories
Journal classification
Research performance
Normalization
European paradox
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.5
论文数:
1.6K
被引数:
7.9K
机构
引用论文
Potential profit gains from improving pasture productivity on New Zealand South Island high-country farms新西兰南岛高海拔地区牧场提高生产力所带来的潜在利润增长
A comparison of the scientific performance of the US and the European union at the turn of the 21st century
SCIENTOMETRICS
IF3.5
A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes
SCIENTOMETRICS
IF3.5

