.png){kind=icon}
返回
Subitizing, unlike estimation, does not process sets in parallel
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1038/s41598-020-72860-4.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Enumeration of very small quantities is a common task that we perform everyday. Much research has highlighted that in these conditions humans display fast, near errorless performance, a phenomenon dubbed subitizing. It has been suggested that this regime has a pivotal role in numerosity perception. Here we asked if this system can process multiple sets of items in parallel. At odds with what happens for moderate numerosities, we found a strong impairment caused already by the introduction of a second group of items marked by a different color. Adding shape as a cue provided no benefit. The only case in which subitizing was possible was when the target and distractor group were held constant through the experimental block. These results show the surprising fact that whilst being rapid and errorless, subitizing does not have the capability to disentangle multiple groups of items and deals only with coarse stimulus statistics.
Keyword:
ATTENTION
PERCEPTION
NUMEROSITY
OBJECTS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.9
论文数:
27.8W
被引数:
83.5W
机构
引用论文
Investigating whole‐brain metabolite abnormalities in the chronic stages of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.png)
PM&ROAAI
PM&RIF0
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容