arrow
返回

Supporting Read-Across Using Biological Data

delete2016-01-01
delete76
delete
OA
AI
H
Hao Zhu
B
Bouhifd, Mounir
D
Donley, Elizabeth
E
Egnash, Laura
N
Nicole Kleinstreuer
K
Kroese, E. Dinant
L
Liu, Zhichao
L
Luechtefeld, Thomas
J
Jessica Palmer
D
David Pamies
S
Shen, Jie
V
Volker Strauss
W
Wu, Shengde
T
Thomas Härtung *
DOI:10.14573/altex.1601252delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Read-across, i.e., filling toxicological data gaps by relating to similar chemicals for which test data are available, is usually done based on chemical similarity. Besides structure and physico-chemical properties, biological similarity based on biological data adds extra strength to this process. In the simplest case, chemically similar substances also show similar test results in relevant in vitro assays. This is a well-established method for the read-across of, e.g., genotoxicity assays. Larger datasets of biological and toxicological properties of hundreds and thousands of substances are becoming available, enabling big data approaches in read-across studies. In the context of developing Good Read-Across Practice guidance, a number of case studies using various big data sources were evaluated to assess the contribution of biological data to enriching read-across. An example is given for the US EPA's ToxCast dataset which allows read-across for high quality uterotrophic assays for estrogenic endocrine disruption. Similarly, an example is given for REACH registration data that enhances read-across for acute toxicity studies. A different approach is taken using omics data to establish biological similarity: Examples are given for in vitro stem cell models and short-term in vivo repeated dose studies in rats used to support read-across and category formation. These preliminary biological data-driven read-across studies show the way towards the generation of new read-across approaches that can inform chemical safety assessment.
Keyword:
read-across
biological similarity
safety assessment
big data
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

A
ALTEX-Alternatives to Animal Experimentation
IF:
5.8
论文数:
44
被引数:
2.2K

机构

J
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
学者数:
411
论文数: 174
被引数: 0
R
rutgers university camden
学者数:
488
论文数: 401
被引数: 47
N
national institutes of health (nih) - usa
学者数:
10.3W
论文数: 8.2W
被引数: 7.6K
J
Johns Hopkins University
学者数:
3.3K
论文数: 1.1K
被引数: 0
R
rutgers university new brunswick
学者数:
2.3W
论文数: 1.9W
被引数: 1.5K
R
rutgers university system
学者数:
289
论文数: 833
被引数: 2
N
nih national institute of environmental health sciences (niehs)
学者数:
3.3K
论文数: 2.6K
被引数: 254
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息