.png){kind=icon}
返回
Systematic evaluation with practical guidelines for single-cell and spatially resolved transcriptomics data simulation under multiple scenarios
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1186/s13059-024-03290-y.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Background Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) have led to groundbreaking advancements in life sciences. To develop bioinformatics tools for scRNA-seq and SRT data and perform unbiased benchmarks, data simulation has been widely adopted by providing explicit ground truth and generating customized datasets. However, the performance of simulation methods under multiple scenarios has not been comprehensively assessed, making it challenging to choose suitable methods without practical guidelines.Results We systematically evaluated 49 simulation methods developed for scRNA-seq and/or SRT data in terms of accuracy, functionality, scalability, and usability using 152 reference datasets derived from 24 platforms. SRTsim, scDesign3, ZINB-WaVE, and scDesign2 have the best accuracy performance across various platforms. Unexpectedly, some methods tailored to scRNA-seq data have potential compatibility for simulating SRT data. Lun, SPARSim, and scDesign3-tree outperform other methods under corresponding simulation scenarios. Phenopath, Lun, Simple, and MFA yield high scalability scores but they cannot generate realistic simulated data. Users should consider the trade-offs between method accuracy and scalability (or functionality) when making decisions. Additionally, execution errors are mainly caused by failed parameter estimations and appearance of missing or infinite values in calculations. We provide practical guidelines for method selection, a standard pipeline Simpipe (https://github.com/duohongrui/simpipe; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11178409), and an online tool Simsite (https://www.ciblab.net/software/simshiny/) for data simulation.Conclusions No method performs best on all criteria, thus a good-yet-not-the-best method is recommended if it solves problems effectively and reasonably. Our comprehensive work provides crucial insights for developers on modeling gene expression data and fosters the simulation process for users.
Keyword:
Evaluation
Single-cell transcriptomics
Spatially resolved transcriptomics
Data simulation
Guideline
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
G
IF:
9.4
论文数:
6.4K
被引数:
7.3W
机构
引用论文
Interpolation of Scattered Data: Distance Matrices and Conditionally Positive Definite Functions
PREAI
分享收藏Effects of different intracranial volume correction methods on univariate sex differences in grey matter volume and multivariate sex prediction.png)
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSOAAI
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics弹弓: 单细胞转录组学的细胞谱系和伪时间推断BMC GENOMICSOAAI
BMC GENOMICSIF3.7
OAAI分享收藏
A Fixed-Point Neural Network Architecture for Speech Applications on Resource Constrained Hardware用于资源受限硬件上语音应用的定点神经网络体系结构
PREAI
分享收藏scShapes: a statistical framework for identifying distribution shapes in single-cell RNA-sequencing dataGIGASCIENCEOAAI
GIGASCIENCEIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容