返回
Systematic review methods
DOI:10.1080/1750984X.2021.1966823.png)
摘要
En 中文
Increasingly, sport and exercise psychology researchers are using systematic review methods to examine the evidence on a particular topic. Unfortunately, not all systematic reviews are created equal and the methodological quality of the review will depend on the quality of the methods used in the review process. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of essential methods and resources used in systematic reviews that serve to increase transparency, replicability, robustness, ethics, and translation of results. To achieve our purpose, we describe aspects of the systematic review process including best standards for planning and conducting a systematic review, coherence, literature searches, article screening, data extraction, reporting guidelines, open science practices, publication ethics, and disseminating results. In providing an overview of these methods for systematic reviews, we highlight relevant literature, resources, and examples from the sport and exercise psychology literature. Finally, we offer nine guidelines to follow to enhance systematic review methods used in sport and exercise psychology.
Keyword:
Literature review
literature search
open science
article screening
knowledge translation
publication ethics
期刊
IF:
6.7
论文数:
305
被引数:
2.6K
机构
引用论文
An evaluation of DistillerSR's machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening - impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes对DistillerSR基于机器学习的优先排序工具进行标题/摘要筛选的评估-对审稿人相关结果的影响
Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis走向系统审查自动化: 在研究综合中使用机器学习工具的实用指南
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
IF3.9
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic ReviewsPrisma-s: 对PRISMA声明的扩展,用于报告系统综述中的文献搜索
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
IF3.9
Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE
IF13.4

