.png){kind=icon}
返回
Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.011.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
A key element in solving real-life data science problems is selecting the types of models to use. Tree ensemble models (such as XGBoost) are usually recommended for classification and regression problems with tabular data. However, several deep learning models for tabular data have recently been proposed, claiming to outperform XGBoost for some use cases. This paper explores whether these deep models should be a recommended option for tabular data by rigorously comparing the new deep models to XGBoost on various datasets. In addition to systematically comparing their performance, we consider the tuning and computation they require. Our study shows that XGBoost outperforms these deep models across the datasets, including the datasets used in the papers that proposed the deep models. We also demonstrate that XGBoost requires much less tuning. On the positive side, we show that an ensemble of deep models and XGBoost performs better on these datasets than XGBoost alone.
Keyword:
Tabular data
Deep neural networks
Tree-based models
Hyperparameter optimization
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
15.5
论文数:
4.2K
被引数:
2.7W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏分享收藏
The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance使用秩来避免方差分析中隐含的正态性假设
PREAI
分享收藏Developing Wind and/or Solar Powered Crop Irrigation Systems for the Great Plains为大平原开发风能和/或太阳能作物灌溉系统
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容