.png){kind=icon}
返回
Taking time seriously
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00307.x.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Dramatic world change has stimulated interest in research questions about the dynamics of politics. We have seen increases in the number of time series data sets and the length of typical time series. But three shortcomings are prevalent in published time series analysis. First, analysts often estimate models without testing restrictions implied by their specification. Second, researchers link the theoretical concept of equilibrium with cointegration and error correction models. Third, analysts often do a poor job of interpreting results. The consequences include weak connections between theory and tests, biased estimates, and incorrect inferences. We outline techniques for estimating linear dynamic regressions with stationary data and weakly exogenous regressors. We recommend analysts (1) start with general dynamic models and test restrictions before adopting a particular specification and (2) use the wide array of information available from dynamic specifications. We illustrate this strategy with data on Congressional approval and tax rates across OECD countries.
Keyword:
POLITICAL-ECONOMY
DYNAMICS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.6
论文数:
2.7K
被引数:
1.6W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏Elite economic forecasts, economic news, mass economic judgments, and presidential approval.png)
JOURNAL OF POLITICS
JOURNAL OF POLITICSIF3.8
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容