.png){kind=icon}
返回
Taming Uncivil Discourse
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/pops.12626.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
In an era of seemingly intense populist politics, a variety of issues of intergroup prejudice, discrimination, and conflict have moved center stage in much of the industrialized world. Among these is political correctness and, in particular, what constitutes a legitimate discourse of political and social conflict and opposition. Yet the meaning of legitimate discourse is being turned on its head as some disparaged groups seek to reclaim, or reappropriate, slurs directed against them. Using as a context a U.S. Supreme Court case about whether The Slants-a band named after a traditional slur against Asians-can trademark its name, we test several hypotheses about reappropriation processes based on a nationally representative sample with an oversample of East Asian Americans and several survey experiments. We find that motives attributions influence how people understand and evaluate potentially disparaging words. In particular, when reappropriation motives are perceived, insulting words are judged to be less insulting. In this sense, uncivil discourse can to some degree be tamed.
Keyword:
intergroup conflict
incivility
reappropriation
racial slurs
hate speech
dehumanization
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.5
论文数:
2.4K
被引数:
7.6K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏Cross-Border Media and Nationalism: Evidence from Serbian Radio in Croatia跨境媒体和民族主义: 来自克罗地亚塞尔维亚广播电台的证据
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏From infra-humanization to discrimination: The mediation of symbolic threat needs egalitarian norms
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容