arrow
返回

Technical analysis, spread trading, and data snooping control

delete2023-01-01
delete2
delete
OA
AI
I
Ioannis Psaradellis *
J
Jason Laws
A
Athanasios A. Pantelous
G
Georgios Sermpinis
DOI:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.10.002delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
This paper utilizes a large universe of 18,410 technical trading rules (TTRs) and adopts a technique that controls for false discoveries to evaluate the performance of frequently traded spreads using daily data over 1990-2016. For the first time, the paper applies an excessive out-of-sample analysis in different subperiods across all TTRs examined. For commodity spreads, the evidence of significant predictability appears much stronger compared to equity and currency spreads. Out-of-sample performance of portfolios of significant rules typically exceeds transaction cost estimates and generates a Sharpe ratio of 3.67 in 2016. In general, we reject previous studies' evidence of a uniformly monotonic downward trend in the selection of predictive TTRs over 1990-2016. Crown Copyright (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Institute of Forecasters. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Technical trading rules
Spread trading predictability
False discovery rate
Bootstrap test
Portfolio performance
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

International Journal of Forecasting 封面图
International Journal of Forecasting
IF:
7.1
论文数:
3.1K
被引数:
9.9K

机构

M
Monash University
学者数:
5.4W
论文数: 5.4W
被引数: 79
U
university of st andrews
学者数:
9.5K
论文数: 1.0W
被引数: 15
U
University of Liverpool
学者数:
2.8W
论文数: 2.5W
被引数: 3.5W
U
university of glasgow
学者数:
3.5W
论文数: 3.1W
被引数: 37
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容