arrow
Return

Technology readiness levels for machine learning systems

delete2022-10-20
delete41
delete
OA
AI
A
Alexander Lavin *
C
Ciarán M. Gilligan-Lee
A
Alessya Visnjic
S
Siddha Ganju
D
Dava Newman
S
S. Ganguly
D
Danny B. Lange
A
Atılım Güneş Baydin
A
Amit Sharma
A
Adam Gibson
S
Stephan Zheng
E
Eric P. Xing
C
Chris A. Mattmann
J
James F. Parr
Y
Yarin Gal
DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-33128-9delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The development of machine learning systems has to ensure their robustness and reliability. The authors introduce a framework that defines a principled process of machine learning system formation, from research to production, for various domains and data scenarios. The development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. Lack of diligence can lead to technical debt, scope creep and misaligned objectives, model misuse and failures, and expensive consequences. Engineering systems, on the other hand, follow well-defined processes and testing standards to streamline development for high-quality, reliable results. The extreme is spacecraft systems, with mission critical measures and robustness throughout the process. Drawing on experience in both spacecraft engineering and machine learning (research through product across domain areas), we've developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning and artificial intelligence: the Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems while being streamlined for machine learning workflows, including key distinctions from traditional software engineering, and a lingua franca for people across teams and organizations to work collaboratively on machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies. Here we describe the framework and elucidate with use-cases from physics research to computer vision apps to medical diagnostics.
Keywords:
DESIGN
HEALTH
POWER
BIAS
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Nature Communications cover
Nature Communications
IF:
15.7
Papers:
9.2W
Citations:
91.2W

Organization

S
salesforce
Scholars:
64
Papers: 70
Citations: 0
C
Carnegie Mellon University
Scholars:
1.4W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 2.7W
U
University College London
Scholars:
7.9W
Papers: 6.2W
Citations: 15.7W
N
national aeronautics & space administration (nasa)
Scholars:
3.1W
Papers: 2.6W
Citations: 46
N
nasa jet propulsion laboratory (jpl)
Scholars:
6.9K
Papers: 5.3K
Citations: 14
U
university of london
Scholars:
21.5W
Papers: 19.7W
Citations: 305
M
Microsoft
Scholars:
3.0K
Papers: 2.7K
Citations: 7
researcher View more organizations