.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
Difference scores have been widely used in studies of fit, similarity, and agreement. Despite their widespread use, difference scores suffer from numerous methodological problems. These problems can be mitigated or avoided with polynomial regression analysis, and this method leas become increasingly prevalent during the past decade. Unfortunately; a number of potentially damaging myths have begun to spread regarding the drawbacks of difference scores and the advantages of polynomial regression. If these myths go unchecked, difference scores and the problems they create are likely to persist in studies of fit, similarity; and agreement. This article reviews 10 difference score myths and attempts to dispel these myths, focusing on studies conducted since polynomial regression was formally introduced as an alternative to difference scores.
Keyword:
PERSON-ENVIRONMENT FIT
LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE
MET-EXPECTATIONS
ORGANIZATION FIT
CONGRUENCE MYTH
MANAGERIAL WORK
RATINGS
QUALITY
SELF
SATISFACTION
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
7.6
论文数:
886
被引数:
1.4W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
Linear pressure profile estimation along a penstock associated with transients due to severe defects.png)
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容