.png){kind=icon}
返回
Terminating links between emission trading programs
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jeem.2015.03.003.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Links between emission trading programs are not immutable, as highlighted by New Jersey's exit from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in 2011. This raises the question of what to do with existing permits that are banked for future use-choices that have consequences for market behavior in advance of, or upon speculation about, delinking. We consider two delinking policies. One differentiates banked permits by origin, the other treats banked permits the same. We describe the price behavior and relative cost-effectiveness of each policy. Treating permits differently generally leads to higher costs, and may lead to price divergence, even with only speculation about delinking. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Emissions trading
Linking
Delinking
Speculation
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.9
论文数:
2.6K
被引数:
1.2W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏
Linking existing and proposed GHG emissions trading schemes in North America.png)
CLIMATE POLICY
CLIMATE POLICYIF5.2
PREAI
分享收藏
Causes of the EU ETS price drop: Recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything?-New evidence欧盟ETS价格下跌的原因: 衰退，清洁发展机制，可再生能源政策还是一切？-新证据ENERGY POLICY
ENERGY POLICYIF9.2
PREAI
分享收藏Linking emissions trading schemes for international aviation and shipping emissions将国际航空和航运排放的排放交易计划联系起来CLIMATE POLICY
CLIMATE POLICYIF5.2
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容