.png){kind=icon}
返回
Testing Factor Models in the Cross-Section
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106626.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The standard full-sample time-series asset pricing test suffers from poor statistical properties, look -ahead bias, constant-beta assumptions, and rejects models when average factor returns deviate from risk premia. We therefore confront prominent equity pricing models with the classical Fama and MacBeth (1973) cross-sectional test. For all models, we uncover three main findings: (i) the intercept coefficients are economically large and highly statistically significant; (ii) cross-sectional factor risk premium esti-mates are generally far below the average factor excess returns; and (iii) they are usually not statistically significant. Overall, all new factor models are inconsistent with no-arbitrage pricing and cannot accurately explain the cross-section of stock returns.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Factor models
cross-sectional tests
no-arbitrage pricing
beta estimation
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
J
IF:
3.8
论文数:
6.4K
被引数:
2.4W
.png){kind=icon}
查看更多内容