arrow
返回

Testing SOAR tools in use

delete2023-06-01
delete4
delete
OA
AI
R
Robert A. Bridges *
A
Ashley E. Rice
S
Sean Oesch
J
Jeffrey A. Nichols
C
Cory Watson
K
Kevin Spakes
S
Savannah Norem
M
Mike Huettel
B
Brian Jewell
B
Brian Weber
C
Connor Gannon
O
Olivia Bizovi
S
Samuel C. Hollifield
S
Samantha Erwin
DOI:10.1016/j.cose.2023.103201delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Investigations within Security Operation Centers (SOCs) are tedious as they rely on manual effort s to query diverse data sources, overlay related logs, correlate the data into information, and then document results in a ticketing system. Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) tools are a rela-tively new technology that promise, with appropriate configuration, to collect, filter, and display needed diverse information; automate many of the common tasks that unnecessarily require SOC analysts' time; facilitate SOC collaboration; and, in doing so, improve both efficiency and consistency of SOCs. There has been no prior research to test SOAR tools in practice; hence, understanding and evaluation of their ef-fect is nascent and needed. In this paper, we design and administer the first hands-on user study of SOAR tools, involving 24 participants and six commercial SOAR tools. Our contributions include the ex-perimental design, itemizing six defining characteristics of SOAR tools, and a methodology for testing them. We describe configuration of a cyber range test environment, including network, user, and threat emulation; a full SOC tool suite; and creation of artifacts allowing multiple representative investigation scenarios to permit testing. We present the first research results on SOAR tools. Concisely, our findings are that: per-SOC SOAR configuration is extremely important; SOAR tools increase efficiency and reduce context switching, although with potentially decreased ticketing accuracy/completeness; user preference is slightly negatively correlated with their performance with the tool; internet dependence varies widely among SOAR tools; and balance of automation with assisting decision making is preferred by senior par-ticipants. We deliver a public user-and tool-anonymized and-obfuscated version of the data.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Security orchestration automation and
response (SOAR)
Test and evaluation
User study
Security operation center (SOC)
Cybersecurity technology
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

C
Computers and Security
IF:
5.4
论文数:
4.6K
被引数:
1.4W

机构

U
united states department of energy (doe)
学者数:
11.3W
论文数: 9.6W
被引数: 246
O
oak ridge national laboratory
学者数:
1.5W
论文数: 1.0W
被引数: 20
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Clustering pesticides according to their molecular properties, fate, and effects by considering additional ecotoxicological parameters in the TyPol method
err2017-12-02
err0
PREAI
errHarouna Traoré; Olivier Crouzet; Laure Mamy; Christine Sireyjol; Virginie Rossard; Rémi Servien; Eric Latrille; Fabrice Martin-Laurent; Dominique Patureau; Pierre Benoit
err分享
err收藏
Intrinsic Properties and Future Perspective of HfO2/V2O5/HfO2 Multi-Layer Thin Films via E-Beam Evaporation as a Transparent Heat Mirror
err2022-03-25
err0
errOAAI
errDaniyal Asif Cheema; Muhammad Osama Danial; Muhammad Bilal Hanif; Abdulaziz Salem Alghamdi; Mohamed Ramadan; Abdul Khaliq; Abdul Faheem Khan; Tayyab Subhani; Martin Motola
err分享
err收藏
Seclius: An Information Flow-Based, Consequence-Centric Security Metric
err2015-02-01
err16
PREAI
errZonouz, Saman A.; Berthier, Robin; Khurana, Himanshu; Sanders, William H.; Yardley, Tim
err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
LiSET: A Framework for Early‐Stage Life Cycle Screening of Emerging Technologies
err2018-08-17
err0
errOAAI
errChristine Roxanne Hung; Linda Ager‐Wick Ellingsen; Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容