.png){kind=icon}
返回
The Case for Adaptive Security Interventions
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1145/3471930.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Despite the availability of various methods and tools to facilitate secure coding, developers continue to write code that contains common vulnerabilities. It is important to understand why technological advances do not sufficiently facilitate developers in writing secure code. To widen our understanding of developers' behaviour, we considered the complexity of the security decision space of developers using theory from cognitive and social psychology. Our interdisciplinary study reported in this article (1) draws on the psychology literature to provide conceptual underpinnings for three categories of impediments to achieving security goals, (2) reports on an in-depth meta-analysis of existing software security literature that identified a catalogue of factors that influence developers' security decisions, and (3) characterises the landscape of existing security interventions that are available to the developer during coding and identifies gaps. Collectively, these show that different forms of impediments to achieving security goals arise from different contributing factors. Interventions will be more effectivewhere they reflect psychological factors more sensitively andmarry technical sophistication, psychological frameworks, and usability. Our analysis suggests adaptive security interventions as a solution that responds to the changing security needs of individual developers and a present a proof-of-concept tool to substantiate our suggestion.
Keyword:
Security decisions
developers
security goals
security interventions
cognitive psychology
social psychology
adaptive software engineering
期刊
A
IF:
6.2
论文数:
1.2K
被引数:
3.4K
机构
引用论文
Dual Unnatural Amino Acid Incorporation and Click‐Chemistry Labeling to Enable Single‐Molecule FRET Studies of p97 Folding.png)
ChemBioChem
OAAI
ChemBioChemIF0
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容