返回
The Deliberative Value Formation model
DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.015.png)
摘要
En 中文
It is increasingly argued that preferences and values for complex goods such as ecosystem services are not preformed but need to be generated through a process of deliberation and learning. While the number of studies incorporating deliberation in monetary and non-monetary valuation of ecosystem services is increasing, there is a limited theoretical basis to how values are influenced and shaped in social valuation processes. In this paper we present the Deliberative Value Formation (DVF) model, a new theoretical model for deliberative valuation informed by social-psychological theory. Anchored within a broader theoretical framework around shared and plural values, the DVF model identifies a range of potential positive (e.g. learning) and negative (e.g. social desirability bias) outcomes of deliberation and key factors that influence outcomes (e.g. ability to deliberate, institutional factors, power dynamics). It also conceptualises how values may be formed by 'translating' transcendental values, our principles and life goals, into more specific contextual values. Underpinned by this theoretical model, we present a six-step template for designing deliberative valuation processes. The DVF provides a theoretical and methodological framework for more rigorous monetary and non-monetary deliberative valuation, and enables more effective integration of social learning and plural knowledges and values in valuation and decision-making.
Keyword:
Participatory methods
Social learning
Shared values
Transcendental values
Deliberative monetary valuation
Deliberative non-monetary valuation
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.6
论文数:
1.8K
被引数:
1.1W
机构
引用论文
How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
IF3.2
Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods
POLICY SCIENCES
IF3.7

