.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
Leading advocates for microfinance have put forward an enticing win-win proposition: microfinance institutions that follow the principles of good banking will also be those that alleviate the most poverty. This vision forms the core of widely-circulated best practices, but as a general proposition the vision is fully supported neither by logic nor by the available empirical evidence. Recognizing the limits to the win-win proposition is an important step toward reaching a more constructive dialogue between microfinance advocates that privilege financial development and those that privilege social impacts. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
poverty
credit
microenterprise
Bangladesh
Indonesia
期刊
IF:
4.8
论文数:
8.1K
被引数:
3.1W
机构
暂无机构信息
.png){kind=icon}
