1
Return

The Relationship Between HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Use and Laboratory-Confirmed Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Positivity Among a Diverse; Multi-City Cohort of Sexually Active Sexual and Gender Minorities in the United States

delete2025-10-28
delete0
PRE
AI
E
Elizabeth A. Yonko *
J
Jiahao Tian
K
Kiana Aminzadeh
Y
Yuhang Qian
G
Gilda Noori
M
Michael Plankey
M
M. Reuel Friedman
F
Frank J. Palella
D
Deborah L. Jones
G
Gina M. Wingood
A
Anjali Sharma
J
Jodie A. Dionne
A
Andrew Edmonds
B
Beverly E. Sha
B
Bradley E. Aouizerat
A
Amanda B. Spence
T
Tracey E. Wilson
R
Roger Detels
M
Matthew J. Mimiaga
DOI:10.1177/10872914251390196delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The presence of chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis infection is a significant risk factor for HIV acquisition and transmission and disproportionately impacts men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women. While HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces HIV risk, its use may influence sexual behaviors, potentially increasing sexually transmitted infection (STI) exposure. Conversely, PrEP users are often more engaged in care, regularly screened and treated for STIs, and may access other prevention tools such as doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis. Studies on the relationship between PrEP use and STIs have shown mixed results. This cross-sectional analysis included 392 participants (381 cisgender MSM; 11 transgender women) enrolled in the US-based Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study/WIHS Combined Cohort Study between 2021 and 2024 who were sexually active in the year prior to STI testing and HIV negative at their most recent study visit. We assessed whether bacterial STI positivity (i.e., laboratory-confirmed chlamydia and gonorrhea at the urethral, pharyngeal, and/or rectal sites and/or current/past syphilis infection) differed by current PrEP use (yes/no). Multi-variable logistic regression models included sociodemographic and behavioral covariates that were associated with bacterial STI positivity at p < 0.05, with the most parsimonious models selected based on the lowest Akaike Information Criterion. Overall, 32.7% reported current PrEP use. Syphilis was the most prevalent STI (6.8%), followed by chlamydia (3.2%) and gonorrhea (2.1%); 11.7% of PrEP users tested positive for at least one STI, compared with 6.1% of non-PrEP users. Among PrEP users, 37.9% reported stopping or decreasing condom use, and 31.6% reported an increased number of sex partners after initiating PrEP. In both bivariate and multi-variable models, PrEP use was associated with higher odds of gonorrhea positivity (adjusted odds ratio = 4.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10–20.04, p = 0.037) and greater odds of being positive for at least one STI (crude odds ratio = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.06–3.90, p = 0.041). No significant differences were observed for chlamydia and syphilis by PrEP use status. Overall, these findings suggest that current PrEP users (vs. non-PrEP users) have an increased odds of bacterial STI positivity, particularly gonorrhea, in a diverse, multi-city cohort of HIV negative, sexually active MSM and transgender women in the United States PrEP remains highly effective in preventing HIV, and our results underscore the importance of integrated sexual health services that support ongoing STI screening and prevention alongside PrEP use among sexual and gender minorities.

Journal

AIDS Patient Care and STDs cover
AIDS Patient Care and STDs
IF:
3.8
Papers:
2.5K
Citations:
3.2K

Organization

R
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Scholars:
42
Papers: 14
Citations: 0
U
university of alabama at birmingham
Scholars:
1.7K
Papers: 700
Citations: 0
N
northwestern university
Scholars:
4.5K
Papers: 1.8K
Citations: 1
C
Columbia University
Scholars:
7.1W
Papers: 6.4W
Citations: 262
R
Rush University Medical Center
Scholars:
77
Papers: 37
Citations: 1.1W
U
University of California Los Angeles
Scholars:
702
Papers: 386
Citations: 10.4W
S
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University
Scholars:
3.2K
Papers: 2.5K
Citations: 2.9K
N
New York University
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.9W
Citations: 5.8W
G
Georgetown University Medical Center
Scholars:
192
Papers: 93
Citations: 4.6K
U
University of Miami
Scholars:
1.1K
Papers: 439
Citations: 3.0W
U
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Scholars:
2.1K
Papers: 852
Citations: 7.4W
G
Georgetown University
Scholars:
1.6W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 1.5W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers