.png){kind=icon}
返回
The sampling problem in measuring policy mood: An alternative solution
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.2307/2647825.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Measuring policy mood poses difficulties for researchers because a random sample of salient policy issues necessary to derive this concept cannot be generated. Consequently, efforts must be taken to weight the contribution of existing survey items by the salience of their topics. Unfortunately issue salience varies by political context, and no consensus exists on which setting should be used to assess salience. Stimson (1991) assumes in his seminal work that the frequency with which survey organizations tap opinions on various issues mirrors the salience of these issues in national politics. However, he provides no evidence that this is the case. Rather than assuming pollsters capture political salience, I explicitly measure salience by the prominence given to issues by the public. These alternative specifications of salience identify different structures underlying aggregate domestic policy preferences. These different forms of mood are not trivial, but can affect how mood shapes other political phenomena.
Keyword:
SUPREME-COURT
PUBLIC-OPINION
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.8
论文数:
5.8K
被引数:
1.3W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
分享收藏Three-Dimensional Protein Fold Determination from Backbone Amide Pseudocontact Shifts Generated by Lanthanide Tags at Multiple Sites由镧系元素标签在多个位点产生的骨架酰胺假接触位移确定三维蛋白质折叠.png)
Structure
OAAI
StructureIF0
OAAI分享收藏COMPARISON OF 5 RULES FOR DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF COMPONENTS TO RETAIN确定要保留的组件数量的5个规则的比较PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETINIF19.8
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容