arrow
返回

Tolerating concept and sampling shift in lazy learning using prediction error context switching

delete1997-01-01
delete78
PRE
AI
S
Salganicoff, M *
DOI:10.1023/A:1006515405170delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
In their unmodified form, lazy-learning algorithms may have difficulty learning and tracking time-varying input/output function maps such as those that occur in concept shift. Extensions of these algorithms, such as Time-Windowed forgetting (TWF), can permit learning of time-varying mappings by deleting older exemplars, but have decreased classification accuracy when the input-space sampling distribution of the learning set is time-varying. Additionally, TWF suffers from lower asymptotic classification accuracy than equivalent non-forgetting algorithms when the input sampling distributions are stationary. Other shift-sensitive algorithms, such as Locally-Weighted forgetting (LWF), avoid the negative effects of time-varying sampling distributions, but still have lower asymptotic classification in non-varying cases. We introduce Prediction Error Context Switching (PEGS), which allows lazy-learning algorithms to have good classification accuracy in conditions having a time-varying function mapping and input sampling distributions, while still maintaining their asymptotic classification accuracy in static tasks. PECS works by selecting and re-activating previously stored instances based on their most recent consistency record. The classification accuracy and active learning set sizes for the above algorithms are compared in a set of learning tasks that illustrate the differing time varying conditions described above. The results show that the PEGS algorithm has the best overall classification accuracy over these differing time-varying conditions, while still having asymptotic classification accuracy competitive with unmodified lazy-learners intended for static environments.
Keyword:
lazy learning
non-stationary function
concept drift
nearest neighbor learning
time-varying functions
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Artificial Intelligence Review 封面图
Artificial Intelligence Review
IF:
13.9
论文数:
6.1K
被引数:
1.9W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息