arrow
返回

Tomotherapy treatment site specific planning using statistical process control

delete2018-09-01
delete11
delete
OA
AI
D
Diana Binny *
C
Craig M. Lancaster
M
Mikel Byrne
T
Tanya Kairn
J
Jamie Trapp
S
Scott Crowe
DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.08.003delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Background: This study investigated planned MLC distribution and treatment region specific plan parameters to recommend optimal delivery parameters based on statistical process techniques. Methods: A cohort of 28 head and neck, 19 pelvic and 23 brain pre-treatment plans were delivered on a helical tomotherapy system using 2.5 cm field width. Parameters such as gantry period, leaf open time (LOT), actual modulation factor, LOT sonogram, treatment duration and couch travel were investigated to derive optimal range for plans that passed acceptable delivery quality assurance. The results were compared against vendor recommendations and previous publications. Results: No correlation was observed between vendor recommended gantry period and percentage of minimum leaf open times. The range of gantry period (min-max) observed was 16-21 s for head and neck, 15-22 s for pelvis and 13-18 s for brain plans respectively. It was also noted that the highest percentage (average ((X) over bar) +/- SD) of leaf open times for a minimum time of 100 ms was seen for brain plans (53.9 +/- 9.2%) compared to its corresponding head and neck (34.5 +/- 4.2%) and pelvic (32.0 +/- 9.4%) plans respectively. Conclusions: We have proposed that treatment site specific delivery parameters be used during planning that are based on the treatment centre and have detailed recommendations and limitations for the studied cohort. This may enable to improve efficiency of treatment deliveries by reducing inaccuracies in MLC distribution.
Keyword:
Treatment delivery
Leaf open time
Leaf latency
Statistical process control
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

P
Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics
IF:
2.7
论文数:
3.1K
被引数:
6.4K

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

Anatomy of the cardiac conduction system心脏传导系统的解剖
err2020-11-12
err0
PREAI
errSantosh K. Padala; José‐Angel Cabrera; Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
TREATMENT PLANNING TO IMPROVE DELIVERY ACCURACY AND PATIENT THROUGHPUT IN HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY
err2009-07-01
err50
errOAAI
errWesterly, David C.; Soisson, Emilie; Chen, Quan; Woch, Katherine; Schubert, Leah; Olivera, Gustavo; Mackie, Thomas R.
err分享
err收藏
A pre-treatment quality assurance survey on 384 patients treated with helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy
err2016-03-01
err10
PREAI
errBrestiani, Sara; Miranti, Anna; Di Dia, Amalia; Maggio, Angelo; Bracco, Christian; Poli, Matteo; Di Spirito, Davide; Gabriele, Pietro; Stasi, Michele
err分享
err收藏
Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures
err2007-05-31
err27
PREAI
errMavroidis, Panayiotis; Ferreira, Brigida Costa; Shi, Chengyu; Lind, Bengt K.; Papanikolaou, Nikos
err分享
err收藏
QA for helical tomotherapy: Report of the AAPM Task Group 148
err2010-08-20
err240
errOAAI
errLangen, Katja M.; Papanikolaou, Niko; Balog, John; Crilly, Richard; Followill, David; Goddu, S. Murty; Grant, Walter, III; Olivera, Gustavo; Ramsey, Chester R.; Shi, Chengyu
err分享
err收藏
Evaluation of the optimal combinations of modulation factor and pitch for Helical TomoTherapy plans made with TomoEdge using Pareto optimal fronts
err2015-09-17
err16
errOAAI
errDe Kerf, Geert; Van Gestel, Dirk; Mommaerts, Lobke; Van den Weyngaert, Danielle; Verellen, Dirk
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容