.png){kind=icon}
返回
Toward a pluralistic conservation science
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1111/conl.12952.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This editorial reflects on the history of the conservation movement, the strong continuing influence of its colonial past, and the counter-emergence of a more pluralistic and respectful worldview. Conservation Letters seeks to support and foster an ethical and inclusive discipline of conservation that discards elements of its colonial and racist history. This will involve broadening the disciplinary scope of conservation and paying greater attention to traditional ecological knowledge and nonwestern conservation approaches. We also see a particular need for theoretical advances that guide conservation practice by informing and connecting different kinds of expertise to understand social-ecological interactions and their implications for both people and ecosystems. Conservation can and should play a vital role in securing the joint future of ecosystems and people, but it will only achieve its full potential if it retains its social license and stays relevant to emerging concerns and values.
Keyword:
biodiversity
conservation biology
conservation practice
Indigenous knowledge
justice
wildlife management
期刊
IF:
5.9
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
6.6K
机构
引用论文
分享收藏分享收藏Lost in transportation: Information measures and cognitive limits in multilayer navigation.png)
SCIENCE ADVANCES
OAAI
SCIENCE ADVANCESIF12.5
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容