arrow
返回

Toward an evolutionary-predictive foundation for creativity

delete2015-11-02
delete10
delete
OA
AI
L
Liane Gabora *
S
Stuart Kauffman
DOI:10.3758/s13423-015-0925-1delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Dietrich and Haider (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21 (5), 897-915, 2014) justify their integrative framework for creativity founded on evolutionary theory and prediction research on the grounds that theories and approaches guiding empirical research on creativity have not been supported by the neuroimaging evidence. Although this justification is controversial, the general direction holds promise. This commentary clarifies points of disagreement and unresolved issues, and addresses mis-applications of evolutionary theory that lead the authors to adopt a Darwinian (versus Lamarckian) approach. To say that creativity is Darwinian is not to say that it consists of variation plus selection - in the everyday sense of the term - as the authors imply; it is to say that evolution is occurring because selection is affecting the distribution of randomly generated heritable variation across generations. In creative thought the distribution of variants is not key, i.e., one is not inclined toward idea A because 60 % of one's candidate ideas are variants of A while only 40 % are variants of B; one is inclined toward whichever seems best. The authors concede that creative variation is partly directed; however, the greater the extent to which variants are generated non-randomly, the greater the extent to which the distribution of variants can reflect not selection but the initial generation bias. Since each thought in a creative process can alter the selective criteria against which the next is evaluated, there is no demarcation into generations as assumed in a Darwinian model. We address the authors' claim that reduced variability and individuality are more characteristic of Lamarckism than Darwinian evolution, and note that a Lamarckian approach to creativity has addressed the challenge of modeling the emergent features associated with insight.
Keyword:
High order cognition
Creativity
Darwinian evolution
Communal exchange
Selection
Dual process
Neuroscience
Prediction
Cognitive neuroscience
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

P
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
IF:
3
论文数:
4.5K
被引数:
1.5W

机构

I
institute for systems biology (isb)
学者数:
1.1K
论文数: 823
被引数: 9
U
University of British Columbia
学者数:
7.0W
论文数: 6.1W
被引数: 8.6W
引用论文

引用论文

Technology adoption: Amplifying versus simplifying innovations
err1996-10-01
err0
PREAI
errBruce G. S. Hardie; Thomas S. Robertson; William T. Ross
err分享
err收藏
Oxaliplatine, acide folinique et 5-fluorouracile (folfox) en seconde ligne thérapeutique du cancer colorectal métastasé
err1997-10-01
err0
PREAI
errA de Gramont; C Tournigand; C Louvet; T André; JL Molitor; E Raymond; S Moreau; J Vignoud; N Le Bail; M Krulik; le Gercod
err分享
err收藏
Longitudinal study of effects of oral dosage of Bifidobacterium bifidum G9‐1 on Japanese cedar pollen‐induced allergic nasal symptoms in guinea pigs
err2015-11-24
err0
errOAAI
errSatoru Tsunemine; Yasuhiro Isa; Hiroshi Ohno; Satoko Hagino; Hideki Yamamura; Nobuaki Mizutani; Takeshi Nabe
err分享
err收藏
Final analysis of a randomized comparison of letrozole (Let) vs observation (Obs) as late reintroduction of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) after completion of prior AET: ANZBCTG 0501 (LATER).
err2015-05-20
err0
PREAI
errNicholas Zdenkowski; Michael Green; Frances M. Boyle; George Kannourakis; Peter Grantley Gill; Evan Bayliss; Christobel Saunders; Stephen Della-Fiorentina; Neill Kling; Ian Campbell; Val Gebski; Anne-Sophie Veillard; Lucy Claire Davies; Rochelle Thornton; Akiko Fong; Linda Louise Reaby; John F. Forbes
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容