返回
Towards a practical multi-hazard interrelation classification: implications for assessing their impacts
DOI:10.1007/s11069-025-07901-0.png)
摘要
En 中文
Many extreme hazardous events do not occur in isolation, but rather interact with other events, as they occur simultaneously, cascadingly, or consecutively. Hazard interrelations are critical components in hazard assessments in today’s complex and interconnected world. One event may directly or indirectly affect other hazard events through various types of spatiotemporal connections within the geophysical environment. These interrelations can greatly amplify or create new emerging impacts, often in ways that are underestimated by traditional methods. Especially considering the large volume of work done within the area of multi-hazards, there is still a lack of applying these ideas in practical disaster risk management. Drawing on the state-of-the-art conceptual models and empirical insights, as well as iterative feedback from practitioners, we propose a practical classification aid for these multi-hazard interrelations. Guided by the division into type, spatial and temporal assessment of interrelations, we propose a TST (Type–Space–Time) classification showing examples for all the different connection possibilities. We present 36 combinations of hazard interrelations and provide examples of historical multi-hazard events for each of them, including a practical framework that supports preparatory measures, response strategies, and planning decisions. It aims to provide a practical approach that aids in defining methods for assessing the frequency and intensity of multi-hazard events, the dynamic exposure and vulnerability, and combining these in multi-hazard loss assessment for specific multi-hazard scenarios, as well as in risk assessment, including the probability of such scenarios occurring. We also provide conceptual models on how to assess the impact of multi-hazards for various combinations of hazard interrelations.
Keyword:
Hazard interrelation
Multi-hazard
Classifications
Impact assessment
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.7
论文数:
9.6K
被引数:
2.8W
机构
引用论文
On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research关于使用诸如ChatGPT之类的基于AI的工具来支持管理研究
What can we learn about multi-hazard impacts from global disaster records?从全球灾害记录中,我们能了解关于多灾种及其风险动态的哪些信息?

