arrow
返回

Towards using count-level weak supervision for crowd counting

delete2021-01-01
delete68
delete
OA
AI
Y
Yinjie Lei
刘艳 (Yan Liu)
P
Pingping Zhang
L
Lingqiao Liu *
DOI:10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107616delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Most existing crowd counting methods require object location-level annotation which is labor-intensive and time-consuming to obtain. In contrast, weaker annotations that only label the total count of objects can be easy to obtain in many practical scenarios. This paper focuses on the problem of weakly-supervised crowd counting which learns a model from a small amount of location-level annotations (fully-supervised) and a large amount of count-level annotations (weakly-supervised). Our study reveals that the most straightforward, that is, directly regressing the integral of density map to the object count, fails to provide satisfactory performance. As an alternative solution, we propose a method by taking advantage of the fact that the total count can be estimated via different-but-equivalent density maps. Our key idea is to enforce the consistency between those density maps and total object count on weakly labeled images as regularization terms. We realize this idea by using multiple density map estimation branches and a carefully devised asymmetry training strategy, called Multiple Auxiliary Tasks Training (MATT). Through extensive experiments on existing datasets and a newly proposed dataset, we validate the effectiveness of the proposed weakly-supervised method and demonstrate its superior performance over existing solutions. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Crowd counting
Count-level annotation
Weak supervision
Auxiliary tasks learning
Asymmetry training
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Pattern Recognition 封面图
Pattern Recognition
IF:
7.6
论文数:
1.3W
被引数:
4.5W

机构

U
University of Adelaide
学者数:
2.3W
论文数: 2.4W
被引数: 4.2W
D
Dalian University of Technology
学者数:
5.9W
论文数: 4.4W
被引数: 5.5W
S
sichuan university
学者数:
12.1W
论文数: 7.8W
被引数: 100
学者 查看更多机构