.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
Urban scholarship is bursting with comparison. We use comparison as an explicit and implicit tool to frame our urban analysis. But how do we actually do comparison? This commentary presents a fine-tuned analysis of 'tracing' as both a conceptual framework and a methodological process for doing comparative urbanism. It draws on the many excellent contributions in this special issue to argue for three methodological approaches to tracing - following the trace, the people doing the tracing and the pathways of tracing - adding reflections that are not only theoretically valuable but also practically useful. In concluding, I argue that this approach of tracing highlights the endless possibilities for thoughtful and productive comparison starting from everywhere and ending up anywhere.
Keyword:
comparative urbanism
tracing
urban studies
期刊
IF:
4.1
论文数:
7.0K
被引数:
1.6W
机构
引用论文
Beyond variegation: The territorialisation of states, communities and developers in large-scale developments in Johannesburg, Shanghai and London超越多样化: 约翰内斯堡，上海和伦敦的大规模开发中的州，社区和开发商的地域化.png)
URBAN STUDIES.png)
OAAI
URBAN STUDIESIF4.1
OAAI.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏Sphingolipids and Atherosclerosis: The Dual Role of Ceramide and Sphingosine-1-PhosphateAntioxidantsOAAI
AntioxidantsIF0
OAAI分享收藏Shared projects and symbiotic collaborations: Shenzhen and London in comparative conversationURBAN STUDIES
URBAN STUDIESIF4.1
PREAI
分享收藏Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies通过其他地方思考城市: 全球城市研究的比较策略
PREAI
分享收藏A posteriori comparisons, repeated instances and urban policy mobilities: What 'best practices' leave behindURBAN STUDIES
URBAN STUDIESIF4.1
PREAI
分享收藏Socialist worldmaking: The political economy of urban comparison in the Global Cold War社会主义世界制造: 全球冷战中城市比较的政治经济学URBAN STUDIESOAAI
URBAN STUDIESIF4.1
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容