.png){kind=icon}
返回
Trading frequency and event study test specification
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/S0378-4266(96)00021-0.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
We examine the effects of thin trading on the specification of event study tests. Simulations of upper and lower tail tests are reported with and without variance increases on the event date across levels of trading volume. The traditional standardized test is misspecified for thinly traded samples, If return variance is unlikely to increase, then Corrado's rank test provides the best specification and power. With variance increases, the rank test is misspecified. The Boehmer et al. standardized cross-sectional test (Event-study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance, Journal of Financial Economics 30, pp. 253-272) is properly specified, but not powerful, for upper-tailed tests. Lower-tailed alternative hypotheses can best be evaluated using the generalized sign test.
Keyword:
event study research methodology
trading volume
thin trading
nonparametric tests
Nasdaq
期刊
J
IF:
3.8
论文数:
6.4K
被引数:
2.4W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Convenient syntheses of zero valent 2,2′-bipyridine and related complexes of transition metals.png)
Polyhedron
PolyhedronIF0
PREAI
分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容