.png){kind=icon}
返回
Transformative Change Needs Direction
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.3390/su142214844.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Comparing the impacts of future scenarios is essential for developing and guiding the political sustainability agenda. This review-based analysis compares six IPBES scenarios for their impacts on 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 20 biodiversity targets (Aichi targets) for the Europe and Central Asia regions. The comparison is based on a review of 143 modeled scenarios synthesized in a plural cost-benefit approach which provides the distances to multiple policy goals. We confirm and substantiate the claim that transformative change is vital but also point out which directions for political transformation are to be preferred. The hopeful message is that large societal losses might still be avoided, and multiple benefits can be generated over the coming decades and centuries. Yet, policies will need to strongly steer away from scenarios based on regional competition, inequality, and economic optimism.
Keyword:
transformation
plural valuation
Sustainable Development Goals
policy scenarios
期刊
IF:
3.3
论文数:
10.7W
被引数:
28.4W
机构
V
查看更多机构
引用论文
Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals实现可持续发展目标的六个转变.png)
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
NATURE SUSTAINABILITYIF27.1
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏Synthesizing plausible futures for biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe and Central Asia using scenario archetypesECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
OAAI
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETYIF3.2
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏The future value of ecosystem services: Global scenarios and national implicationsECOSYSTEM SERVICES
ECOSYSTEM SERVICESIF6.6
PREAI
分享收藏A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda联合国2030议程中的气候行动可持续发展途径NATURE CLIMATE CHANGEOAAI
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGEIF27.1
OAAI分享收藏 查看更多内容