.png){kind=icon}
返回
TRUST AND CHEATING
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/ecoj.12271.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
When we take a taxi we may feel cheated if the driver takes an unnecessarily long route despite the lack of a contract to take the shortest possible path. Is the behaviour of the driver affected by beliefs about our cheating notions? We address this question in the context of a trust game. We find that both parties to a trust exchange have personal notions of cheating and that these notions have a bimodal distribution. We conceptualise cheating notions as moral expectations, which provide a micro-foundation for guilt. Cheating notions substantially affect decisions on both sides of the trust exchange.
Keyword:
PROMISES
NORMS
GAMES
期刊
IF:
3.6
论文数:
5.5K
被引数:
1.6W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
分享收藏分享收藏
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容